• Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes 

      Jung, Ronald; Al-Nawas, Bilal; Araujo, Mauricio; Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo; Barter, Stephen; Brodala, Nadine; Chappuis, Vivianne; Chen, Bo; De Souza, Andre; Almeida, Ricardo Faria; Fickl, Stefan; Finelle, Gary; Ganeles, Jeffrey; Gholami, Hadi; Hammerle, Christoph; Jensen, Simon; Jokstad, Asbjørn; Katsuyama, Hideaki; Kleinheinz, Johannes; Kunavisarut, Chatchai; Mardas, Nikos; Monje, Alberto; Papaspyridakos, Panos; Payer, Michael; Schiegnitz, Eik; Smeets, Ralf; Stefanini, Martina; ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan; Vazouras, Konstantinos; Weber, Hans-Peter; Weingart, Dieter; Windisch, Péter (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2018-10-17)
      <p><i>Objectives</i>: The aim of Working Group 1 was to address the influence of different local (implant length, diameter, and design) and systemic (medications) factors on clinical, radiographic, and patient‐reported outcomes in implant dentistry. Focused questions on (a) short posterior dental implants (≤6 mm), (b) narrow diameter implants, (c) implant design (tapered compared to a non‐tapered ...
    • Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design 

      Jokstad, Asbjørn; Ganeles, Jeffrey (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2018-10-17)
      <p><i>Background</i>: Dental implants are available in different shapes.</p> <p><i>Aims</i>: This systematic review aims to address whether tapered compared to non‐tapered implants demonstrate similar clinical and patient‐reported outcomes. The review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) format.</p> <p><i>Materials & Methods</i>: We searched ...